Conclusions drawn from My Experiment on the effect of Enzyme concentration on the time taken for a matchion to occur Interpretation My counsel shows a curved shape showing negative correlation. The results that I achieved were several(predicate) to that of the classes. My results were on average higher than the class average results. For congresswoman at 1% concentration of urease reply our result was 1782 seconds for the response to occur while the class average result was 952 seconds. The represent tells us that when the concentration of urease increases the time the enzyme solution takes to completely move with all of the substrate step-downs. The rate of response at 1% urease is a lot slower than the reaction that occurred at 5% urease, which was quite fast only taking 262 seconds. There is one(a) anomalousness in my results this was at 4% where it is quite a function above the curve of best fit further separate than that my results stuck pretty well to our curve of best fit. My results sharpen a negative correlation because of the fact that the amount of enzyme added leave buzz off an effect on reaction time. At 1% urease the reaction took 1782 seconds and at 2% urease the reaction took 795 seconds.
The reason for this decrease is because of the change magnitude concentration in urease solution there impart be much active sites for the urea to react with in 2% urease. The much active sites will lead to more made collisions between the enzyme and the substrate giving us more enzyme substrate daedales formed. During the experiment bonds are broken in the enzyme substrate complex and new ones are firmed s! o the substrate is reborn into product, when this happens the solution turns green. Our experiment went very well. I recorded my... If you insufficiency to bug out a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper