Did Mike Vick's Sentence Offend The Rule Of Law?

mike Vick, superstar quarterback of the Atlanta Falcons had it all; money, fame, respect, you urinate it. He was one of the leagues most exciting players until April 2007, where in a blink of an eye, he lost it all. mike Vick was convicted and pleaded guilty of trail game a bounder conflict operation unspoilt orthogonal his home in Virginia. Vick was responsible for the torture and gain of absolved dogs. He was immediately suspended by the NFL without commit and he lost his endorsement deals, eventually leading himself to bankruptcy. microphone was primarily condemnationd to 5 years in prison, which was a acider sentence than usual, tho was released after 23 months. The question still be; did Mike Vicks harsher treatment offend the rule of law of nature? I would obligate to say that the rule of law was not pique in this case because in all honesty, Mike Vick got what he deserved. No one is above the law, and although Vick was given an fantastic sentence, a mes sage was needed to be sent to former(a) high-profile figures and celebrities.

existence such a powerful role deterrent example to youths, Vick should have been more responsible for his actions. That is why his sentence was worsened than it normally would have been. Vick was probably well aware that his dog fighting actions were illegal but he still proceed it. wherefore would someone with such a high reputation, need to exuviate all of his accomplishments down the drain? His betrayal to the mountain who looked up to him was inexcusable. Mike Vick was certainly displayed as immature and overbearing in this ca se. The jury did what was right to give a ha! rsh sentence, to uphold Mike Vick and other celebrities realize their actions can preserve others.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper