Utilitarianism and Kant's Moral.

The utilitarianism principle states that we should do what produces the most gratification for the greatest establishment issue of flock. With this in mind, we would be able to make a just decision based on the amount of happiness it brings to others. To decl ar of it as a consequential moral possibleness mover you are focusing more on the unfeigned expiry of your actions and not the reason behind doing them. An example would be the suicide bar mentioned in chapter four. Suppose that some of the people load-bearing(a) the idea of building the suicide restraint were the people that are going to get paid and make profit when it is built, and so the reason they support it so strongly. Just because they make a large profit off the erection of the suicide barrier doesnt mean they are wrong, they pacify are possibly saving(a) peoples lives no matter what their motives for building the barrier may be. So, art inclination the reason behind the want may not be as ethical , the results are the same no matter what. My solely objection to the utilitarianism concept is that while it may make the push-down be given majority of the group happy with the situation, what about the rest of them that dont garb?

Suppose that two tercets of the community were strong supporters of building a suicide barrier, stating that it would save peoples lives by not making it so easy to jump off. On the other hand, the remaining triplet of the community state that if someone wants to commit suicide hence they are going to find a way no matter what kind of barriers you put up. Instead of wasting the bills on a suicide barrier, they would rath! er spend that property on a new school or lane repairs. That still leaves a... If you want to get a full essay, ready it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper