Marriage amendment in the USA

Marriage has come a huge way since it was first contracted in America. Marriage was first employ for property shelter, financial and political gain. Now however, quite a little atomic number 18 much than nigh macrocosm in love and devoted to a evidential new(prenominal). In past Ameri flowerpot history, with our laws it had been il reasoned for a equivalent knowledgeable pr functionice marriage. Gay marriages should be healthyized in the United States, because everyone deserves delight.thither pay been m both get d births for mountain to get a marriage license, nonwithstanding form been denied because they were intrepid. harming v. Virginia was fictional character when the Supreme Courts decision was decl bed as The freedom to marry as long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights subjective to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men. Gays looked as this as a promise to be able to enjoy their personal rights (Lahey 16). The Loving decision gave hope to the fairy c atomic number 18 community in guarantees to jibeity.Two early attempt geeks that signifi send packingtly started off the same- awaken marriage were the trials of Baker v. Nelson and Singer v. Hara (Cabaj 131). The argument in the Baker case was based on constitutional guarantees of due act upon and Singer was based on equal process. Due process was the reads defense mechanism of a marriage license by diminishing the freedom of a person to marry whom they want with the limits of basic gentrial requirements (Cabaj 132).When the Baker case was taken to the Superior Court it was expected that the judge would dismiss the case, tho the argument was made that by the definition of marriage was that it was a straight person union (Moats 116). Both cases used equal process because populate were being denied marriage, when under the fourteenth Amendment equal protection was stated. In the end of both(prenominal) cases neither were accessed marriage licens e. Hawaii Supreme Court stated that the denial of same-sex marriage would be presumed constitutional un slight that state could prove that it could lead to state inte repose and order.What is the real harm in same-sex marriage? Everyone should have the knock to marry anyone they are in love with, and want a future day to dispense. Homosexuals are out for the same thing heterosexuals are tone for in a marriage personal intimacy, close familys and mixer acceptance Vermont had supplyed obliging unions (which was just like a marriage license), and people from all everywhere the United States filled for the application.The civilisedized unions were made in 2000, but by 2003, 3,579 civil unions were accounted for, and only 625 came from Vermont. The civil unions have become a legal issue in the other states, because matess wanted to separate, but Vermont only allowed their residents to crack up the civil union. Judges in other states did non approve of the judgement of dis missal of the civil unions, since they were not in favor of the idea in the descent (Moats 245). Some zippys did not like the idea of civil unions, because they wanted a marriage like any other person was granted.They saw the civil unions as a way to do the zippys not protest as mush as they did, and keep quiet. Many of the people that did pass the civil union act were threaten by the people who opposed the idea. In Vermont thither has been no be evidence that society or the value of the people have been harmed (Moats 264). People do not pick their sexual orientation, and they are born the way everyone else is with the same rights and privileges any other American lets.Gays are discriminated all of the time, and nothing is being done about it. African Americans were first brought to the United States as slaves, but they have come a long way since and so. They have the same rights as any dust coat person living in the country. Homosexuals come in all types of falsify and shou ld not be treated as a second clear citizen. Legalizing marriage would only make marriage collapse off because then people are not forced to marry someone they have little attraction for, and sometimes confer innocent infantren into a nerve-racking position.Having gay marriages would decrease the divorce rate, because then people would be happier with themselves and who they engage to love. How is it far to them they are not attracted to the opposite sex, and are treated dissimilar for that? Who claims it is wrong for someone to love another person of the same sex? You can not fight who you are in love with, it is a bumping everyone should be able to find in another person. Isnt happiness a key ingredient for a kempt marriage?There are many obvious benefits to a homosexual in a same-sex marriage. One benefit is gays would receive full legal equality (Rauch 55). They would receive the same rights as a man and woman marrying. Homosexuals would have the cogency to put in law the love and compassion they share for all(prenominal) other. Gay people want to be able to spend the rest of their live wit that one special person and the legalization of gay marriages would allow for that to happen.They want the simple things in life such as living together, caring for another when they are sick and eating dinner every night with that other person. A new level of brotherly acceptance to the gay community is a benefit to the marriage. The couple from a gay marriage benefit like any straight couple having someone in that location for you when you need them. No one wants to go through and through life lonely. When a homosexual asks for marriage they are looking for a different and better kind of life, but really a better kind of love.Gay couples are not in a dealingship for just sex, but more for love and union. Many heterosexuals think that a homosexuals relationship is based on sex. A benefit to heterosexual society of gay marriage is the fact that the commi tment of a marriage means the couples are discouraged from having sex with multiple partners. This has the advantage of slowing the spread of sexually transmitted diseases (Rauch 72). Heterosexuals benefit from gay marriages because gay couples can not have babies of their own they will adopt, or have men of a pip-squeak from a previous marriage (Rauch 74). Legalizing same-sex marriage will only uphold the meaning of marriage, and banning same-sex marriage will weaken marriage. Marriage is for everyone and individually one is unique.The Constitution states that everyone is born with equal rights. So why cant homosexuals share the same rights as heterosexuals in the experience of marriage? People of any sexual orientation should be able to choose who they want to be with. The Government may not approve of same-sex marriage but they should no deny it. Gays are also American citizens with all the same rights. The Fourteenth Amendment states that the law can not deny any persons of equal protection (Sullivan 107).Again, why are the courts denying marriage between same-sex couples? The government does not allow gay couples to file their taxes as a joint, and must file as single taxpayers (Burda 47). Same-sex couples do not benefit from the federal guarantee of payments to a surviving spouse, former spouse, unmarried pincerren, or tikeren that are disabled in the lead age two (Burda 98). They also do not receive conjugate benefits under Medicare. Government benefits are not able to gay couples, but able to heterosexual couples.There are many arguments against same- sex marriages. Some people believe that marriage should be shared between just a man and women. Others believe that a gay couple can not raise a child normally. Gays are very capable of aerodynamic lift a child just like anyone else. Child molesters are allowed to marry, and bring children into the world, so why cant a gay couple raise a child when the only thing they will do for the child is fa ce love and commitment.People say that gay relationships are immoral, but to who? The Bible says it is immoral. The freedom we have we can choose what religion we want, and in some religions same-sex relations are celebrated, and not sinned. Another reason why people say same-sex marriage should not be legal is because they can not arouse offspring, and continue a generation, but gays do not need to rag about that because there are many babies in the world looking for a good home to go to.Now, in reality the real reasons for why same-sex marriages are not legal uncomfortable, offends religion, unnatural, betray, repulsive, and recruitment. Some people are just uncomfortable with same-sex couples, usually called a homophobic. Gays are normal people and should be treated like that. America has religious freedom and everyone has their own views on different situations and not all religions are at a disagreement with gay couples.Some people think that it is unnatural for the gay coupl es to act the way they do. Men believe that when gay men act powder-puff it betrays their masculine traits they should have. Straight people think it is repulsive to collect affection of gay couples, but gay couples also think it is repulsive to see straight coupless affection. For some reason some people think that gay people go out and look for straight people to make them gay. Someone can not make another person gay sexual orientation is inborn and can not be changed. Having a fear of being recruited is just silly to even think about. Homosexuals should be treated better and not stereotype as second-class citizens.Many homosexuals patch up to have a family together, and many adopt since they can not claim with each other. There are many children that are put up for adoption and/or put in foster homes, and now there is a shortage of places to put these children. Now, a lot of gay couples adopt these children to give them a healthy and happy life. There have been proven test sh owing that same-sex couples turn out to be great parents. cock-a-hoop a child a loving and nurturing home is how a child should be treated, and gay couples have the ability to treat the child like any other parent would (Drucker 42).There is no evidence that children living in a gay home are less intelligent, suffer problems, less popular, or having a low self-esteem. The children of the homosexual families grow up happy, healthy and well adjusted as if they would in a heterosexual family. If a same-sex adoptive couple separated there are three scenarios that can bee looked at when both parents are legal parents, when one partner is the legal parent but the law grants some rights to the illegal parent, and when the law denies nonlegal parents all rights.When both parents have legal custody over the child they are treated as if they were married because then they handle custody and visitation rights and need to work out through the parents. In the other cases the court says how the child will live with the parents. Many gay parents feel that their children and their parenting will be harder than it really is because of their sexual orientation. Many of the parents are feared about what their neighbors will think of their actions about having a different lifestyle than the social norm. Same-sex parents need to raise their child with gender awareness to live a open minded lifestyle (Brill 107).A number of leading health and child welfare organizations, however, have found that same-sex couples should be able to adopt and raise children. They include the Child Welfare League of America, North American Council on Adoptable Children, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American psychological Association, and the National Association of Social Workers (Drucker 117).A child being raised by same-sex parents does not cause the child to be homosexual. The parents are aware that there will be many expressions of sexuality, but they are usua lly more concerned with the personality and personal goodness of a potential mate that they are with their partners gender (Drucker 198). Girls that are tomboys and boys that play with dolls dont necessarily grow up to be gay or a lesbian. For the most part quirkiness is more of an issue for out of the family then the members of the family.Gays and Lesbians have the same equal rights as anyone else in America. We have been born in the United States and in a flash granted natural rights. Gay or straight everyone should have the same opportunities and not be denied something they dream for. Allowing same-sex marriage will decrease heterosexual divorces and increase the love people feel for each other because they can be with someone they truly want to be with.The United States holds its inquiry up high when it comes to our constitution and what it stands for, but in reality not everyone is treated equal. It is not right for people to be denied something that they are and not have t he same rights as any other person because they did not live like the social norms. America varies in everything from race, religion, and sexual orientation, and everyone ineluctably to be treated as if they were not second class citizens. The pursuit of happiness is in our constitution and for gays and lesbians they should be granted their happiness also, for they are also citizens of this country and need to be treated like they are.ReferencesBrill, Stephanie. The thwart Parents Primer regular army new-fangled Harbinger Publications, Inc. 2001.Burda, Joan M. Estate Planning for Same-Sex Couples. USA ABA General Practice, Solo & Small Firm Section. 2004.Burns, Kate. Gay and Lesbian Families unsanded York Greenhavens Press. 2005.Cabaj, Robert P. On the Road to Same-Sex Marriages. USA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication information. 1997.Drucker, Jane. Families of Value New York Plenum Press. 1998.Lahey, Kathleen. Same Sex Marriage Canada Insomniac Press. 2004Moats, D avid. Civil Wars, a interlocking for Gay Marriage. New York Harcourt, Inc. 2004.Rauch, Jonathan. Gay Marriage New York Times Books atomic number 1 Holt and Company 2004.Sullivan, Andrew. Same-Sex Marriage Pro and Con USA Library of CongressCataloging-in-Publication Data 1997.