.

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Analysis of Case Study for Skills and Knowledge - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theAnalysis of Case Study for Skills and Knowledge. Answer: The enablers of innovation mainly help in bringing the continuous stream of the innovation related strategies of the organizations. The innovation enablers help in the application of the skills, knowledge and the specific tools in the organizations. The five different types of enablers are discussed below, Behaviour The ways of interacting with others when they have different ideas can make huge difference. The behaviour of the people are similar to actions. The actions that are taken by a person continuously can be termed as behaviour. Attitudes The attitude of the person is another enabler related to innovation and the attitude of the leader of a team determines the attitudes of the members. The positive attitudes of the employees are related to ways of following the instructions and the negative attitudes are related to the resistance that is provided by the employees towards change (Mageswari, Sivasubramanian and Dath 2015). Structure The structure of an organization is also an enabler of innovation which helps in putting the things in place. The structure of the organization involves factors like, approval, authority and information flow. Example The organizational structure of Google helps in the innovation related activities in the organization and fosters the ideas of the employees. Environment The environment of the organization acts as an enabler of innovation and implementation of changes. Skills The skills of the employees are also related to the ways by which innovation is enabled in the organization. Example The skills of the employees of Apple and the training provided to them are major enablers of innovation (Tran and Voyer 2015). Introduction and change and the implementation of innovative ideas are sometimes difficult for the organizations. The driving forces of innovation can be described as the factors which help in the implementation of change in the organizations. The first driver of innovation in organizations is commoditization. This force relates to the pressure of driving the prices and the margins lower. The digital revolution in the external environment deals acts as a driving force for the changes to be implemented in the organizational processes. The advent of social media in the business world acts as a driver of innovation and helps in the creation of communities, sharing information and connecting the people instantly. Globalization is another major driver of the innovation in organizations. The levels of competition have increased due to the increase in the scope of business of the organizations. The high levels of competition further enable innovation and change implementation in the various organizations. The increasing turbulence in the business environment due to the changes in the economy and shift in the demographics acts as a driver of the innovation in the organization (Gupta and Barua 2016). The companies need to move in a faster pace to compete with the others in the market and improve their operations accordingly. The culture of the organization where change is to be implemented is also a driver of innovation. The enablers of innovation on the other hand are mainly related to the behaviour and the attitudes of the employees. The structure of the organization is a major enabler of innovation. The structure is mainly related to the hierarchy of the organization and the ways by which the instructions and directions related to change reach the employees. The skills of the employees of the organization play a major role in the implementation of change and innovative ideas (Rizos et al. 2016). The difference between the drivers and the enablers of innovation is that the drivers of innovation are mainly related to the factors of the organization and the external environment where it operates. On the other hand, the enablers of innovation are mainly related to the employees and the internal environment of the organization. The enablers mainly deal with the skills and the attitudes of the employees who are a major part of the entire change process (Hussein et al. 2016). The process of innovation in an organization is supported by various mechanisms which are discussed as follows, Broadcasting The search with the help of broadcast involves the publishing of innovation related request. This request is depicted as a challenge to the vast audience with the hope that a solution has been developed. Brainstorming This is the next step related to the support provided in the innovation process. This phase is related to the clear explanation of the problem and trying to generate set of innovative ideas from the employees of the organization. The ideas are created on an open platform and further these are filtered with the help of feedback (Kaushik et al. 2014). Licensing out The organizations post the possible solutions on various platforms so that they can be adopted by the people who can value them. Networking or connecting This step is related to the creation of a network so that they can build relationships with the help of communication and develop opportunities for the purpose of partnerships and collaboration. Expert teams The teams or collaborations are created by experts so that they evolve themselves by developing ideas. The organizations can also foster the groups by selecting the members from the community or hiring new members for the group (Dubey et al. 2015). The organization which has been examined in the case study, namely, ACME, believed in the creation of innovative methods to perform business operations. The organization has a modern infrastructure and the research and development facility which is present in the company helps the employees in the process of thinking. The innovative ideas and nature of the employees are nurtured and encouraged by the management of the organization. The organization has been developing the research and development related facilities since the time of its establishment. The surplus revenues that are gained in the operations of the organization are invested in further developing the research and development related facilities. The owner of the organization also spends most of the time with the employees who are a part of the R D team. This helps in fostering their talent and innovative ideas further and work in a collaborative manner (Bhanot, Rao and Deshmukh 2017). References Bhanot, N., Rao, P.V. and Deshmukh, S.G., 2017. An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing.Journal of cleaner production,142, pp.4412-4439. Dubey, R., Sonwaney, V., Aital, P., Venkatesh, V.G. and Ali, S.S., 2015. Antecedents of innovation and contextual relationship.International Journal of Business Innovation and Research,9(1), pp.1-14. Gupta, H. and Barua, M.K., 2016. Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using bestworst multi criteria decision making method.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,107, pp.69-79. Hussein, A.T.T., Singh, S.K., Farouk, S. and Sohal, A.S., 2016. Knowledge sharing enablers, processes and firm innovation capability.Journal of Workplace Learning,28(8), pp.484-495. Kaushik, A., Kumar, S., Luthra, S. and Haleem, A., 2014. Technology transfer: enablers and barriersa review.International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management,14(2), pp.133-159. Mageswari, S.U., Sivasubramanian, C. and Dath, T.S., 2015. Knowledge management enablers, processes and innovation in small manufacturing firms: a structural equation modeling approach.IUP Journal of Knowledge Management,13(1), p.33. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van Der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. and Topi, C., 2016. Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers.Sustainability,8(11), p.1212. Tran, V. and Voyer, B., 2015. Fostering innovation: An organisational perspective.British Journal of Healthcare Management,21(3), pp.141-145.

No comments:

Post a Comment